Review




Structured Review

Compressus Inc camponotus compressus fab
Camponotus Compressus Fab, supplied by Compressus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/camponotus compressus fab/product/Compressus Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
camponotus compressus fab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
Compressus Inc camponotus compressus fab
Camponotus Compressus Fab, supplied by Compressus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/camponotus compressus fab/product/Compressus Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
camponotus compressus fab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Compressus Inc camponotus compressus
Collection sites, number of insects collected and their morpho-molecular characterization.
Camponotus Compressus, supplied by Compressus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/camponotus compressus/product/Compressus Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
camponotus compressus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Collection sites, number of insects collected and their morpho-molecular characterization.

Journal: PLOS ONE

Article Title: Molecular identification of Hymenopteran insects collected by using Malaise traps from Hazarganji Chiltan National Park Quetta, Pakistan

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300903

Figure Lengend Snippet: Collection sites, number of insects collected and their morpho-molecular characterization.

Article Snippet: The most commonly identified Hymenopteran insects were Bethylidae sp. (59/538, 9.11%), followed by Tachysphex incertus (Radoszkowski, 1877) (48/538, 8.92%), Cerceris rybyensis (Linnaeus, 1771) (36/538, 8.55%), Tachytes freygessneri (43/538, 7.99%), Formicidae sp. and Lasioglossum sp. (42/538, 7.81%), Hymenoptera sp. (41/538, 7.62%), Anthidium punctatum , Camponotus compressus and Tachysphex sp. (39/538, 7.25%), Megachile leachella (38/538, 7.06%), Sphecidae sp. (37/538, 6.88%) and Evaniidae sp. (35/538, 6.51%) as presented in .

Techniques:

Identification of Hymenoptera insect species through DNA barcoding method and their close matching results are presented.

Journal: PLOS ONE

Article Title: Molecular identification of Hymenopteran insects collected by using Malaise traps from Hazarganji Chiltan National Park Quetta, Pakistan

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300903

Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of Hymenoptera insect species through DNA barcoding method and their close matching results are presented.

Article Snippet: The most commonly identified Hymenopteran insects were Bethylidae sp. (59/538, 9.11%), followed by Tachysphex incertus (Radoszkowski, 1877) (48/538, 8.92%), Cerceris rybyensis (Linnaeus, 1771) (36/538, 8.55%), Tachytes freygessneri (43/538, 7.99%), Formicidae sp. and Lasioglossum sp. (42/538, 7.81%), Hymenoptera sp. (41/538, 7.62%), Anthidium punctatum , Camponotus compressus and Tachysphex sp. (39/538, 7.25%), Megachile leachella (38/538, 7.06%), Sphecidae sp. (37/538, 6.88%) and Evaniidae sp. (35/538, 6.51%) as presented in .

Techniques: